This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
"They Said What?" takes readers on an entertaining journey through some of the most monumentally incorrect predictions ever made. From technology executives dismissing the internet as a fad to movie studios rejecting Star Wars, the book examines epic forecasting failures across every major field. Author Kevin B DiBacco expertly weaves together historical examples, expert analysis, and witty commentary to understand why we're so bad at predicting the future.
The book is structured thematically, exploring failed predictions in technology, business, politics, science, sports, entertainment, finance, social change, and environmental issues. Through engaging storytelling and detailed case studies, DiBacco reveals common patterns in failed predictions - from overconfidence and resistance to change to the inability to imagine exponential progress. Each chapter ends with valuable lessons about how to think more critically about forecasting.
Beyond just cataloging historical blunders, the book provides a framework for better predictive thinking. DiBacco examines cognitive biases that lead us astray, the role of vested interests in shaping predictions, and strategies for making more nuanced forecasts. The final chapter synthesizes key lessons about embracing uncertainty while still striving to make educated guesses about what lies ahead.
Written with humor and insight, "They Said What?" is both highly entertaining and deeply informative. It's essential reading for anyone interested in futurism, decision-making, and why even the smartest people sometimes get things spectacularly wrong. The book ultimately makes a compelling case for approaching predictions with humility, critical thinking, and an openness to radical change.
