Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This text provides an assessment of Brevard S. Childs’s canonical approach to biblical interpretation. An analysis of Childs’s work identifies a number of historical, hermeneutical and theological issues that are central both to Childs’s programme and to the wider methodological debate. These include the adequacy of the historical-critical tools, their relationship to the more recent, synchronic approaches, the role of the interpreter’s own presuppositions, the viability of working from a specific faith-commitment and ways in which the ancient texts can speak to the modern church. Following a discussion of these questions the text suggests how Childs’s programme can be set on a sounder methodological basis. This book is particularly notable for its clarification of Childs’ approach, and for its original solutions to a number of central methodological problems.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This text provides an assessment of Brevard S. Childs’s canonical approach to biblical interpretation. An analysis of Childs’s work identifies a number of historical, hermeneutical and theological issues that are central both to Childs’s programme and to the wider methodological debate. These include the adequacy of the historical-critical tools, their relationship to the more recent, synchronic approaches, the role of the interpreter’s own presuppositions, the viability of working from a specific faith-commitment and ways in which the ancient texts can speak to the modern church. Following a discussion of these questions the text suggests how Childs’s programme can be set on a sounder methodological basis. This book is particularly notable for its clarification of Childs’ approach, and for its original solutions to a number of central methodological problems.