Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
Leonardo da Vinci’s arguments for the supremacy of painting over the arts of poetry, music, and sculpture address issues that have been relevant to debates over the nature of representation since the time Plato discussed imitation until today. This is the argument of Claire Farago in this critical analysis of the first important modern contribution to the comparison of the arts. Her study systematically examines 46 passages compiled in the mid-16th century from 18 of Leonardo’s notebooks and their relationship to the artist’s holograph writings on painting. It provides a critical transcription newly made from the Codex Vaticanus Urbinas 1270 and a new English translation with extensive notes that take into account Leonardo’s scientific terminology, the highly contrived form of his rhetorical argumentation, and the role played by his original editors.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Leonardo da Vinci’s arguments for the supremacy of painting over the arts of poetry, music, and sculpture address issues that have been relevant to debates over the nature of representation since the time Plato discussed imitation until today. This is the argument of Claire Farago in this critical analysis of the first important modern contribution to the comparison of the arts. Her study systematically examines 46 passages compiled in the mid-16th century from 18 of Leonardo’s notebooks and their relationship to the artist’s holograph writings on painting. It provides a critical transcription newly made from the Codex Vaticanus Urbinas 1270 and a new English translation with extensive notes that take into account Leonardo’s scientific terminology, the highly contrived form of his rhetorical argumentation, and the role played by his original editors.