Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
The removal of Smear Layer (SL) after chemical-mechanical preparation of root canals is advocated in the literature, since its permanence is deleterious and can increase bacterial viability within dentinal tubules, isthmuses and accessory canals, preventing disinfection of this region, preventing effective contact of irrigating substances, penetration of intracanal medication and correct sealing by endodontic cements. The aim of this literature review was to discuss the effect of SL on the antibacterial capacity of disinfectant solutions, the efficacy of substances proposed in the literature and auxiliary devices for removing SL, as well as to verify the quality of root canal obturation in the presence or absence of SL. It can be seen that: SL reduces the bactericidal effect of irrigating solutions; various substances are effective for cleaning SL, however, EDTA 17% remains the gold standard in research. As for the protocols for agitating the irrigating solutions, the techniques for activating the solutions are superior to conventional needle irrigation.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
The removal of Smear Layer (SL) after chemical-mechanical preparation of root canals is advocated in the literature, since its permanence is deleterious and can increase bacterial viability within dentinal tubules, isthmuses and accessory canals, preventing disinfection of this region, preventing effective contact of irrigating substances, penetration of intracanal medication and correct sealing by endodontic cements. The aim of this literature review was to discuss the effect of SL on the antibacterial capacity of disinfectant solutions, the efficacy of substances proposed in the literature and auxiliary devices for removing SL, as well as to verify the quality of root canal obturation in the presence or absence of SL. It can be seen that: SL reduces the bactericidal effect of irrigating solutions; various substances are effective for cleaning SL, however, EDTA 17% remains the gold standard in research. As for the protocols for agitating the irrigating solutions, the techniques for activating the solutions are superior to conventional needle irrigation.