Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
Given the interdisciplinary nature of our study, we have first limited ourselves to the sociological Praxeology of KAMBAJI WA KAMBAJI, Kambajism, to which we have associated the theoretical and methodological bases borrowed from Biblical Exegesis, theological hermeneutics, kerygmatic homiletics and the pragmatics of religious knowledge, knowing that it is the nature of the object of study and the objectives of the researcher that determine the choice of the research method to use in a particular sociology. It was necessary for us, in the name of interdisciplinarity, to flesh out our methodological approach by extending Kambajian Praxeology to the discourse of theo-gnoseological power by relying on the two batteries of heuristic prerequisites so that each tendency would not be irritated but would usefully find its part in our analyses. This procedure has allowed us to arrive at the "Interdiscursive Theo-functional Praxeology" and to move towards the "Praxeological Sociology of Gnoseological Pragmatism" by incorporating the key axioms and principles of the Pragmatics of Communication.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Given the interdisciplinary nature of our study, we have first limited ourselves to the sociological Praxeology of KAMBAJI WA KAMBAJI, Kambajism, to which we have associated the theoretical and methodological bases borrowed from Biblical Exegesis, theological hermeneutics, kerygmatic homiletics and the pragmatics of religious knowledge, knowing that it is the nature of the object of study and the objectives of the researcher that determine the choice of the research method to use in a particular sociology. It was necessary for us, in the name of interdisciplinarity, to flesh out our methodological approach by extending Kambajian Praxeology to the discourse of theo-gnoseological power by relying on the two batteries of heuristic prerequisites so that each tendency would not be irritated but would usefully find its part in our analyses. This procedure has allowed us to arrive at the "Interdiscursive Theo-functional Praxeology" and to move towards the "Praxeological Sociology of Gnoseological Pragmatism" by incorporating the key axioms and principles of the Pragmatics of Communication.