Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This is a study of the texts referring or alluding to the dynastic
promise to David in the books of Samuel and Kings and the Law of the
King . Jan Ruckl pays attention to the textual problems of some of the
studied passages, especially 2 Sam 7 which has different meanings in the
most important textual witnesses. Although the most ancient retrievable
text of 2 Sam 7 is not to be identified with MT, this text form
corresponds to the original basic meaning of the chapter. Special
attention is also given to the value of 1 Chr 17 for the reconstruction
of the oldest text of 2 Sam 7. A statistic study of the patterns of
agreements among the witnesses leads to the conclusion that evaluating
many synonymous differences between 2 Sam 7 and 1 Chr 17 - which
cannot be explained as resulting from mistakes or tendentious -
case by case would lead to arbitrary decisions. The great
majority of these differences are a result of the Chronicler’s
relatively free approach to his source.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This is a study of the texts referring or alluding to the dynastic
promise to David in the books of Samuel and Kings and the Law of the
King . Jan Ruckl pays attention to the textual problems of some of the
studied passages, especially 2 Sam 7 which has different meanings in the
most important textual witnesses. Although the most ancient retrievable
text of 2 Sam 7 is not to be identified with MT, this text form
corresponds to the original basic meaning of the chapter. Special
attention is also given to the value of 1 Chr 17 for the reconstruction
of the oldest text of 2 Sam 7. A statistic study of the patterns of
agreements among the witnesses leads to the conclusion that evaluating
many synonymous differences between 2 Sam 7 and 1 Chr 17 - which
cannot be explained as resulting from mistakes or tendentious -
case by case would lead to arbitrary decisions. The great
majority of these differences are a result of the Chronicler’s
relatively free approach to his source.