Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2009 im Fachbereich Anglistik - Literatur, Note: 2,3, Universitat Trier, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 1. Introduction They had dreamed of freedom; of a chance to look about them and learn something; to be decent and clean, to see their child to grow up and be strong (TJ: 168).1 However, the Lithuanian protagonists of Upton Sinclair’s novel The Jungle do not have a chance to fulfil their dreams. They fail, suppressed by the capitalist elite and the daily distress of surviving in the economic jungle of Chicago at the beginning of the 20th century. With his description of the industrial conditions in the meat-packing industry Sinclair gained recognition throughout the US. But, as a work of modern fiction measured against the aesthetic achievements of a Henry James or a William Faulkner or a James Joyce, The Jungle hardly merits any discussion at all. 2 The value of The Jungle as a literary product cannot be traced back to certain stylistic devices, psychological density or any other criteria of so-called high literature. Nevertheless, it is one of the most important novels of its time and, due to its political impact, even one of the most politically influential books in the first decades of the last century. The author became a muckraker, stirring up nationwide attention due to the detailed description of the hygienic conditions in the meatprocessing industry, basing this description on mere facts he gathered from his own observations3 which leads to the characterisation as documentary novel. 4 Those who consider Sinclair insignificant base their rejection upon aesthetic criteria, whereas Sinclair was concerned with the effect of his writings upon his audience - a very different matter. 5 Directly aiming at the hardships of the Lithuanian and other Eastern European immigrants in Chicago, he intended to make literature functional 6, i.e. to use it as a device of directing more attention to the economic suppression in Packingtown, t
