Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
The field of Community Development (CD) is in the grip of a crisis in knowing i.e. what is it and how do we know it works? Until these simple questions can be answered simply, related questions of what should be measured and why it’s important will remain obscure. Measuring Change in Poor Communities is a call to be more deliberate about what is being measured and what it means. The academics, policy experts, and institutional evaluators of CD initiatives have contributed much to this crisis. They decided that the practice of CD is a black box of ideas and techniques germane to no particular body of thought or scholarly discipline. This has helped to precipitate a theory gap that prevents knowledge production by any conventional means - there’s no recognized theory of community change to guide CD research and evaluation. CD practitioners, on the other hand, do have a common understanding of their work. Empirical studies show they intentionally pursue behavioral change objectives that are firmly rooted in our social work traditions and today’s global social change movement. The problem of identifying an analytical model based in sound theory was solved over 50 years ago and CD practice found its natural home in community sociology. It’s time to embrace this epistemological record and a general theory of CD practice.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
The field of Community Development (CD) is in the grip of a crisis in knowing i.e. what is it and how do we know it works? Until these simple questions can be answered simply, related questions of what should be measured and why it’s important will remain obscure. Measuring Change in Poor Communities is a call to be more deliberate about what is being measured and what it means. The academics, policy experts, and institutional evaluators of CD initiatives have contributed much to this crisis. They decided that the practice of CD is a black box of ideas and techniques germane to no particular body of thought or scholarly discipline. This has helped to precipitate a theory gap that prevents knowledge production by any conventional means - there’s no recognized theory of community change to guide CD research and evaluation. CD practitioners, on the other hand, do have a common understanding of their work. Empirical studies show they intentionally pursue behavioral change objectives that are firmly rooted in our social work traditions and today’s global social change movement. The problem of identifying an analytical model based in sound theory was solved over 50 years ago and CD practice found its natural home in community sociology. It’s time to embrace this epistemological record and a general theory of CD practice.