Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
Two predominant critical assumptions about Samuel Richardson-that he is a feminist and that his novels aim to exert a straightforward didactic influence on readers-are challenged by this comparative study of female exemplarity in Clarissa, Sir Charles Grandison, Evelina, and Les Liaisons dangereuses in a theoretically and historically informed context, in order to investigate the ideologically charged terraine of models and modeling in eighteenth-century epistolary fiction. The possibility of the coherent and imitable model, both of female virtue and of stable communication, is negated by the persistence of parasites within the narrative exchanges that attempt to create these ideals. The female subjectivity transacted by Clarissa’s text-reader relation is imagined as a site not of ethical transformation but of crippling shame and self-reproach. Koehler’s readings produce a trajectory in which Burney and Laclose, writing within thirty-five years of Clarissa’s publication, reject Richardson’s use of female exemplarity as a weapon.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Two predominant critical assumptions about Samuel Richardson-that he is a feminist and that his novels aim to exert a straightforward didactic influence on readers-are challenged by this comparative study of female exemplarity in Clarissa, Sir Charles Grandison, Evelina, and Les Liaisons dangereuses in a theoretically and historically informed context, in order to investigate the ideologically charged terraine of models and modeling in eighteenth-century epistolary fiction. The possibility of the coherent and imitable model, both of female virtue and of stable communication, is negated by the persistence of parasites within the narrative exchanges that attempt to create these ideals. The female subjectivity transacted by Clarissa’s text-reader relation is imagined as a site not of ethical transformation but of crippling shame and self-reproach. Koehler’s readings produce a trajectory in which Burney and Laclose, writing within thirty-five years of Clarissa’s publication, reject Richardson’s use of female exemplarity as a weapon.