Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier. Sign in or sign up for free!

Become a Readings Member. Sign in or sign up for free!

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre to view your orders, change your details, or view your lists, or sign out.

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre or sign out.

Davis V. Happyland Toy Company: Case File
Paperback

Davis V. Happyland Toy Company: Case File

$248.99
Sign in or become a Readings Member to add this title to your wishlist.

Joey Davis was two years old when he died after swallowing beads from his sister’s make-your-own jewelry set. Test revealed that Joey had elevated gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) levels in his system at the time of death and that the elevated GHB could have been a result of the chemicals used in the beads. Andy Davis, Joey’s parent, has sued HappyLand Toy Company for strict liability, claiming that the beads were defectively designed. HappyLand Toy Company denies that its beads were defectively designed and has also asserted an affirmative defense of comparative fault, claiming that the negligence and/or recklessness of Andy Davis and/or Joey’s babysitter was more responsible than HappyLand Toy Company for Joey’s death.

Read More
In Shop
Out of stock
Shipping & Delivery

$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout

MORE INFO
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
Date
25 September 2015
Pages
173
ISBN
9781601565020

Joey Davis was two years old when he died after swallowing beads from his sister’s make-your-own jewelry set. Test revealed that Joey had elevated gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) levels in his system at the time of death and that the elevated GHB could have been a result of the chemicals used in the beads. Andy Davis, Joey’s parent, has sued HappyLand Toy Company for strict liability, claiming that the beads were defectively designed. HappyLand Toy Company denies that its beads were defectively designed and has also asserted an affirmative defense of comparative fault, claiming that the negligence and/or recklessness of Andy Davis and/or Joey’s babysitter was more responsible than HappyLand Toy Company for Joey’s death.

Read More
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
Date
25 September 2015
Pages
173
ISBN
9781601565020