Salvation as a Mechanical Process: Do Christians Need to Believe That Jesus Died for Their Sins?

This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.

Christians have been taught that Jesus died on the cross to pay a fine or ransom to expiate or atone for our sins. Furthermore, they have been taught that the death of Jesus is the only way individuals can receive eternal salvation. In general, this notion is called the
doctrine of blood atonement
or
penal substitution,
or some similar name. One reason for this teaching is that the development of Newtonian mechanics has led us to believe that God’s
laws of salvation
must be as easy to understand as the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century
laws
of our physical world. This book demonstrates that there are alternatives for understanding Jesus’ execution that are consistent with the twentieth- and twenty-first-century understanding of our physical world. In fact, the early Christian writers (including the Bible itself) described these alternatives.
Sacrifice
was only one form of the early Christian narrative explaining the death of Jesus. Although
blood atonement
was understandable in ancient Roman culture, it is not understandable in our culture. The inevitable conclusion is that we should abandon
blood atonement
and develop one of the alternative ways of understanding the cosmic significance of Jesus’ execution.