Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
Alex Tissandier argues that an understanding of Deleuze’s relationship to Leibniz is essential for a full understanding of his philosophy. Throughout Deleuze’s work we find two opposing characterisations of Leibniz. On the one hand Deleuze presents Leibniz as a conservative theologian committed to justifying the order and harmony of a God-governed world. On the other, Leibniz appears as a revolutionary thinker credited with ‘the most insane concept creation we have ever witnessed in philosophy’. Tissandier traces Leibniz’s ambiguous status for Deleuze in order to provide a framework for explaining two key ideas in Deleuze’s own philosophy: a concept of difference that is not reducible to a relation of contradiction and an account of the genesis of the world that does not presuppose the structure of representation.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Alex Tissandier argues that an understanding of Deleuze’s relationship to Leibniz is essential for a full understanding of his philosophy. Throughout Deleuze’s work we find two opposing characterisations of Leibniz. On the one hand Deleuze presents Leibniz as a conservative theologian committed to justifying the order and harmony of a God-governed world. On the other, Leibniz appears as a revolutionary thinker credited with ‘the most insane concept creation we have ever witnessed in philosophy’. Tissandier traces Leibniz’s ambiguous status for Deleuze in order to provide a framework for explaining two key ideas in Deleuze’s own philosophy: a concept of difference that is not reducible to a relation of contradiction and an account of the genesis of the world that does not presuppose the structure of representation.