Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed accountability for and controls over U.S. military and economic assistance to El Salvador, to determine: (1) whether any assistance was subject to misuse or diversion; and (2) what accountability and controls are in place. GAO found that: (1) the United States has provided $3.5 billion in economic and military aid to El Salvador since 1980; (2) there was no evidence that U.S. military aid to El Salvador had been diverted or misused since the time that GAO reported on illegal fuel transfers; (3) Salvadoran officials did not emphasize management controls over logistics, due to combat activities; (4) some written guidance was lacking, storage space was inadequate, and inventories and spot checks were not regularly performed; (5) between 1980 and 1989, U.S. economic assistance to El Salvador totalled nearly $2.6 billion, the fourth-largest economic aid program in the world; (6) Salvadoran agencies continue to be affected by serious internal control weaknesses despite the Agency for International Development (AID) mission’s efforts to control funds; and (7) by improving El Salvador’s financial management capability, reductions in the vulnerability of local currency funds could be accomplished.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed accountability for and controls over U.S. military and economic assistance to El Salvador, to determine: (1) whether any assistance was subject to misuse or diversion; and (2) what accountability and controls are in place. GAO found that: (1) the United States has provided $3.5 billion in economic and military aid to El Salvador since 1980; (2) there was no evidence that U.S. military aid to El Salvador had been diverted or misused since the time that GAO reported on illegal fuel transfers; (3) Salvadoran officials did not emphasize management controls over logistics, due to combat activities; (4) some written guidance was lacking, storage space was inadequate, and inventories and spot checks were not regularly performed; (5) between 1980 and 1989, U.S. economic assistance to El Salvador totalled nearly $2.6 billion, the fourth-largest economic aid program in the world; (6) Salvadoran agencies continue to be affected by serious internal control weaknesses despite the Agency for International Development (AID) mission’s efforts to control funds; and (7) by improving El Salvador’s financial management capability, reductions in the vulnerability of local currency funds could be accomplished.