Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier. Sign in or sign up for free!

Become a Readings Member. Sign in or sign up for free!

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre to view your orders, change your details, or view your lists, or sign out.

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre or sign out.

Investigation into Nanocomposites for Applications in Lightning Strike Protection
Paperback

Investigation into Nanocomposites for Applications in Lightning Strike Protection

$112.99
Sign in or become a Readings Member to add this title to your wishlist.

This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.

Aircraft manufacturers are currently looking to use composite materials for aircraft wing skins. Nonconductive composite materials offer little protection against lightning strikes. Conductive nanocomposites are being developed for lightning strike protection. This thesis explores a variety of composites including nickel coated carbon fabric (NiCCF) alone as lightning strike protection and with additional protection systems: nickel-nanostrand veil (NiNS), aligned buckypaper (ABP), non-aligned or random buckypaper (RBP), and a mixed buckypaper (MBP) made up of vapor grown carbon fibers (VGCF) and single walled nanotubes (SWNT). Each of the systems are tested under monotonic compression for ultimate compressive strength as well as compressive fatigue loading conditions before and after a simulated lightning strike. Their behaviors are compared to determine which system provides the best lightning strike protection. Overall results of testing conclude that RBP lends a 20% increase in effectiveness to lightning strike protection over the NiCCF only. NINS decreases effectiveness of lightning strike protection by 20%. Other systems tested showed effectiveness between these two cases. The most common failure in specimens after strike is delamination along the longitudinal fibers of the NiCCF and is thus deemed the weakest point of all systems which should be mitigated in future systems to improve effectiveness.

Read More
In Shop
Out of stock
Shipping & Delivery

$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout

MORE INFO
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Biblioscholar
Date
6 December 2012
Pages
136
ISBN
9781288409730

This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.

Aircraft manufacturers are currently looking to use composite materials for aircraft wing skins. Nonconductive composite materials offer little protection against lightning strikes. Conductive nanocomposites are being developed for lightning strike protection. This thesis explores a variety of composites including nickel coated carbon fabric (NiCCF) alone as lightning strike protection and with additional protection systems: nickel-nanostrand veil (NiNS), aligned buckypaper (ABP), non-aligned or random buckypaper (RBP), and a mixed buckypaper (MBP) made up of vapor grown carbon fibers (VGCF) and single walled nanotubes (SWNT). Each of the systems are tested under monotonic compression for ultimate compressive strength as well as compressive fatigue loading conditions before and after a simulated lightning strike. Their behaviors are compared to determine which system provides the best lightning strike protection. Overall results of testing conclude that RBP lends a 20% increase in effectiveness to lightning strike protection over the NiCCF only. NINS decreases effectiveness of lightning strike protection by 20%. Other systems tested showed effectiveness between these two cases. The most common failure in specimens after strike is delamination along the longitudinal fibers of the NiCCF and is thus deemed the weakest point of all systems which should be mitigated in future systems to improve effectiveness.

Read More
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Biblioscholar
Date
6 December 2012
Pages
136
ISBN
9781288409730