Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
David Bowie’s 2015 Blackstar has been understood by critics and fans alike to have a certain valedictory status. For them, perhaps for us, it is a 39-minute and 13-second farewell. A long goodbye. My angle is different. By situating the Bowie/Renck collaboration on Lazarus in the context of a meditation on the question once posed by Georg Stanitzek, Was ist Kommunikation? I consider the CD and the video as experiments in re-configuration. More specifically, by thinking about the distinctly cinematic iteration of the question of communication (citing here Captain’s what we have here is … failure to communicate from Cool Hand Luke) I propose that mediated communication embodies the Ich/Es modality of dialogue disparaged by Martin Buber. What this invites us to consider is whether Lazarus in particular isn’t the generation of an audiovisual tombeau from which or out of which communication strains are to be heard. Is it saying farewell? Is it saying anything? By drawing on Jacques Derrida’s appropriation of the crypt in the work of Abraham and Torok, I propose that Lazarus manages (and the feat is neither small nor insignificant) to communicate nothing. In effect, Lazarus is the very sound, not of a failure to communicate, but of a speaking emptied of what protects it from mediation. Here, Bowie’s gnomic persona assumes a political valence not typically ascribed to it. This work was published by Saint Philip Street Press pursuant to a Creative Commons license permitting commercial use. All rights not granted by the work’s license are retained by the author or authors.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
David Bowie’s 2015 Blackstar has been understood by critics and fans alike to have a certain valedictory status. For them, perhaps for us, it is a 39-minute and 13-second farewell. A long goodbye. My angle is different. By situating the Bowie/Renck collaboration on Lazarus in the context of a meditation on the question once posed by Georg Stanitzek, Was ist Kommunikation? I consider the CD and the video as experiments in re-configuration. More specifically, by thinking about the distinctly cinematic iteration of the question of communication (citing here Captain’s what we have here is … failure to communicate from Cool Hand Luke) I propose that mediated communication embodies the Ich/Es modality of dialogue disparaged by Martin Buber. What this invites us to consider is whether Lazarus in particular isn’t the generation of an audiovisual tombeau from which or out of which communication strains are to be heard. Is it saying farewell? Is it saying anything? By drawing on Jacques Derrida’s appropriation of the crypt in the work of Abraham and Torok, I propose that Lazarus manages (and the feat is neither small nor insignificant) to communicate nothing. In effect, Lazarus is the very sound, not of a failure to communicate, but of a speaking emptied of what protects it from mediation. Here, Bowie’s gnomic persona assumes a political valence not typically ascribed to it. This work was published by Saint Philip Street Press pursuant to a Creative Commons license permitting commercial use. All rights not granted by the work’s license are retained by the author or authors.