Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier. Sign in or sign up for free!

Become a Readings Member. Sign in or sign up for free!

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre to view your orders, change your details, or view your lists, or sign out.

Hello Readings Member! Go to the member centre or sign out.

 
Paperback

Love through Death in Modern Hebrew: A Syntactic Treatment

$13.99
Sign in or become a Readings Member to add this title to your wishlist.

Investigating the verb la-mut ‘to die’ in Hebrew, one observes that, depending on the context, it has a secondary meaning ranging from ‘want’ to ‘ love’. It will be argued here that the different readings of the verb stem from a regularity in Hebrew according to which some verbs may change their interpretation in a predictable way, depending on their syntactic environment; when followed by a NP, the verb is interpreted as a comment on a situation; where followed by S, no such comment is required. The syntactic arguments for the analysis are based upon the operation of the Noun Phrase Constraint. The semantic arguments assume that a sentence embedded in a NP is a presupposition of the entire sentence. This analysis suggests that some verbs of perception and the like have as one of their semantic features [+/-comment] and some may add such a feature through the process of the semantic reading of the entire utterance .

Read More
In Shop
Out of stock
Shipping & Delivery

$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout

MORE INFO
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Undena Publications,U.S.
Country
United States
Date
31 December 1979
Pages
16
ISBN
9780890039175

Investigating the verb la-mut ‘to die’ in Hebrew, one observes that, depending on the context, it has a secondary meaning ranging from ‘want’ to ‘ love’. It will be argued here that the different readings of the verb stem from a regularity in Hebrew according to which some verbs may change their interpretation in a predictable way, depending on their syntactic environment; when followed by a NP, the verb is interpreted as a comment on a situation; where followed by S, no such comment is required. The syntactic arguments for the analysis are based upon the operation of the Noun Phrase Constraint. The semantic arguments assume that a sentence embedded in a NP is a presupposition of the entire sentence. This analysis suggests that some verbs of perception and the like have as one of their semantic features [+/-comment] and some may add such a feature through the process of the semantic reading of the entire utterance .

Read More
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Undena Publications,U.S.
Country
United States
Date
31 December 1979
Pages
16
ISBN
9780890039175