Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
William James’ celebrated lecture on The will to Believe has kindled spirited controversy since the day it was delivered. In this lively reappraisal of that controversy, Professor O'Connell contributes some fresh contentions: that James’ argument should be viewed against his indebtedness to Pascal and Renouvier; that it works primarily to validate our over-beliefs ; and most surprising perhaps, that James envisages our passional nature as intervening, not after, but before and throughout, our intellectual weighing of the evidence for belief.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
William James’ celebrated lecture on The will to Believe has kindled spirited controversy since the day it was delivered. In this lively reappraisal of that controversy, Professor O'Connell contributes some fresh contentions: that James’ argument should be viewed against his indebtedness to Pascal and Renouvier; that it works primarily to validate our over-beliefs ; and most surprising perhaps, that James envisages our passional nature as intervening, not after, but before and throughout, our intellectual weighing of the evidence for belief.