Readings Newsletter
Become a Readings Member to make your shopping experience even easier.
Sign in or sign up for free!
You’re not far away from qualifying for FREE standard shipping within Australia
You’ve qualified for FREE standard shipping within Australia
The cart is loading…
This collection of essays gives a non-technical analysis of the essential relationship between politics and literature and makes a commonsense protest against the overly-theoretic separation of the two. The first group of essays are on general themes, including the effect of Political Theatre , the second group focuses on George Orwell while the final group celebrates notable events in modern theatre. Bernard Crick shows that much Political Theatre is often both bad theatre and simplistic politics, but that good producers bring out the political elements, even in apparently unpolitical dramas such as Twelfth Night . In his discussion of Orwell, he emphasises the role of biographer as historian rather than novelist , and challenges the view that the far Left dominated writing in the Thirties. Like Orwell he believes that good writing is not always for a good cause, and that the good cannot always write.
$9.00 standard shipping within Australia
FREE standard shipping within Australia for orders over $100.00
Express & International shipping calculated at checkout
This collection of essays gives a non-technical analysis of the essential relationship between politics and literature and makes a commonsense protest against the overly-theoretic separation of the two. The first group of essays are on general themes, including the effect of Political Theatre , the second group focuses on George Orwell while the final group celebrates notable events in modern theatre. Bernard Crick shows that much Political Theatre is often both bad theatre and simplistic politics, but that good producers bring out the political elements, even in apparently unpolitical dramas such as Twelfth Night . In his discussion of Orwell, he emphasises the role of biographer as historian rather than novelist , and challenges the view that the far Left dominated writing in the Thirties. Like Orwell he believes that good writing is not always for a good cause, and that the good cannot always write.