This title is printed to order. This book may have been self-published. If so, we cannot guarantee the quality of the content. In the main most books will have gone through the editing process however some may not. We therefore suggest that you be aware of this before ordering this book. If in doubt check either the author or publisher’s details as we are unable to accept any returns unless they are faulty. Please contact us if you have any questions.
Sarah Madry has written a bold and revelatory answer to those who have said the mystery of the Man in the Iron Mask will never be solved. The masked prisoner, arrested by lettre de cachet personally dictated and signed by Louis XIV, was named Eustache Dauger. The king kept Dauger in prison for thirty-four years from 1669 to his death in the Bastille in November 1703. No one knows why he was arrested, why he was never killed but instead treated compassionately and kept for life in the most secure prison cells ever created in the Ancien Regime.
Sarah Madry spent fifteen years analyzing the cold case and traveled to France eight times to look at handwritten manuscripts, sixteenth-century medical encyclopedias, old primers on poison, and testaments of kings and princes. She used old French maps to direct her to remote farmhouses in the countryside, queried French departmental archivists, interrupted the afternoons of curators of the Museum of the History of Paris, and waited for church services to end before walking up the aisle to ask the priest about what was buried in the crypt. Her theories are entirely different from anything before written because her interdisciplinary approach brought the history of medicine and the culture of seventeenth-century France to help untangle the many clues in the original documents that were always available, but never seen as useful.
Finally, Second Son is about the salvation, by any means necessary, of a royal dynasty that had ceased producing heirs. If Madry's theory that Queen Anne of Austria's plot to secure the continuation of the Bourbon dynasty succeeded, when kings and armies could not, is correct, historians will have much to reconsider.
