Are the Humanities Inconsequent?: Interpreting Marx's Riddle of the Dog
Jerome J. McGann
Are the Humanities Inconsequent?: Interpreting Marx’s Riddle of the Dog
Jerome J. McGann
Adapting the discontinuous and multi-tonal critical procedures of works like Carlyle’s Sartor Resartus and Laura Riding’s Anarchism Is Not Enough, Jerome McGann subjects current literary studies to a patacritical investigation. The investigation centers in the interpretation of a notorious modern riddle: Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog, it’s too dark to read. Working by indirection and from multiple points of view, the book argues that aesthetics is always a science of exceptions, and that any given critical practice is also always an exception from itself. The book works from two assumptions: first, that the riddle of the dog conceals an allegory about book culture and is addressed to the academic custodians of book culture; and second, that any explanation of the riddle is necessarily implicated in the problem posed by the riddle. It therefore remains to be seen-it is the reader’s part to decide-whether the book is a friend to man or-perhaps like the riddle of the dog- too dark to read.
This item is not currently in-stock. It can be ordered online and is expected to ship in approx 4 weeks
Our stock data is updated periodically, and availability may change throughout the day for in-demand items. Please call the relevant shop for the most current stock information. Prices are subject to change without notice.
Sign in or become a Readings Member to add this title to a wishlist.